Apple now more evil
Posted on 2010-04-10 15:23:00
Tags: rant essay gay
I've always been a kind of fan of Apple - back during my technology "coming of age" days (college), Microsoft was dominant and Apple was the little guy struggling to stay alive. They put out the iPod, which was cool, and Mac OS X was UNIX-based which was exciting. Since then I've owned three iPods and a MacBook Pro, all of which I've been happy with.
But, as I mentioned a few weeks ago, now that Apple has had a lot of success, they've started doing a lot of things that make me uncomfortable. The iPhone being such a closed environment should have been a bigger canary in the coal mine.
Apple announced the new features in iPhone OS 4, coming out this summer. Now they've got some sort of multitasking and some other neat stuff. But it turns out there are some seriously restricting changes to the license.
Exhibit A: Apple is requiring that iPhone (and iPad) applications be "originally written" in one of the languages that runs on the iPhone/iPad. Basically, they're saying that you can't use an intermediate layer (like, say, the iPhone compiler in Adobe CS5, which is going to release next week) to write your programs. I can understand why they might want to do this, but regardless it puts a lot of apps out of business and is a big restriction on how people can develop for the iPhone/iPad. Apple may think that apps are "better" that are developed with their tools, etc., but the market should decide this.
So I'm pretty much at the point where I'm rooting against Apple. It makes me sad, because they do make nice products, but the whole closed ecosystem is just too much to bear. Unfortunately, even developers leaving the iPhone platform in droves may not have any real impact on iPhone sales.
(obligatory: Palm's WebOS phones allow you to install even apps that Palm hasn't approved, pretty much the polar opposite of Apple. Go Palm!)
Comment from onefishclappin:
1) Apply has always been a closed system. Even back in the day of Apple IIE and stuff, the "tinker'ability" of the Apples was horrible. Doesn't surprise me as what they are doing now w/iP**s.
2) I heard about that. How stupid and horrible. I can't believe parents participated and encouraged such mean behavior. And I can't believe there were no students who spoke up (unless most of them didn't really know about the double cross). I'll make a promise to you - I promise that I will raise nice children who will not do something like that.
Comment from anonymous:
I've hear others argue closed platform - honestly, that doesn't bug me. I deal with so many applications on a daily basis that I don't want to re-engineer my phone to be able to use it. Even if Apple is a bit of a douchebag, as long as I have a high-quality user experience I don't mind.
I'm more worried about the just announced iAd, where you will be presented with some sort of interactive ad. It very suspicious that multitasking appears in the same revision with something that wants to interrupt you to present an iAd. Multitasking would be required for such a thing, as a reset of your application data would be really annoying. For this feature, Apple is taking a 40% cut of advertising revenue.
I'm now unsure of my next phone purchase. I also wonder if Google will do the same when they can get away with it. They like ad revenues too.
This backup was done by LJBackup.